Tokyo College Event “The Gothic Cathedral of Science: The Nobel Prize and the Concept of ‘Revolution’” by Prof.Svante Lindqvist - Tokyo College

Tokyo College Event “The Gothic Cathedral of Science: The Nobel Prize and the Concept of ‘Revolution’” by Prof.Svante Lindqvist

2019.05.27 @ 13:30 – 15:30

We ask Professor Svante Lindqvist, former Director of the Nobel Museum and former President of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, “Has the Nobel Prize distorted our view of scientific development?”

On May 27, 2019, Professor Lindqvist gave a lecture on “The Gothic Cathedral of Science: The Nobel Prize and the Concept of Revolution’.” Professor Lindqvist talked about the “development of science” by analogy to the history of cathedral architecture, while sharing his experiences at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (the institution that confers the Nobel Prize), and engaged in a three-way discussion with Professor Takaaki Kajita (Distinguished Professor at the University of Tokyo, and Director of its Institute for Cosmic Ray Research) and Professor Takuji Okamoto (Professor at Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, the University of Tokyo).

Moderator Masaki Sano (Deputy College Director) introduced the purpose of Tokyo College and of the lecture. Tokyo College is a new initiative of the University of Tokyo to consider the ideal future for humanity and the planet, together with motivated persons from around the world, and move towards realizing such a future.

What does “revolution” mean?

Professor Lindqvist explained that the Nobel Prize has been awarded for scientific “revolutions,” for which there are the following two categories: (1) discoveries that revolutionize a particular scientific discipline; and (2) discoveries whose practical implementation has brought about a revolutionary change for many individuals. He also stated that there is a difference in the meaning of the word “revolution” as used by natural scientists and as used by historians of science; in contrast to natural scientists, who use the word “revolution” casually, historians of science prefer not to use the word at all.

Sociologists of science criticize natural science as only undertaking positivist research, while natural scientists criticize sociologists of science as undertaking meaningless work. Professor Lindqvist, who undertakes research in both physics and the history of science, and who belongs to both camps, told of how he feels a dilemma in such circumstances.

The perception gap regarding the development of scientific knowledge

Maintaining that there is a perception gap between these two camps regarding the development of scientific awareness, Professor Lindqvist said that “During the last 30 years or so, social constructivists have largely dictated the history of science, known as social constructional science. In terms of the Gothic cathedral metaphor, it is as though they are not interested in the construction and growth of this large edifice… Natural scientists, on the other hand, regard the development of scientific knowledge as the construction of a colossal cathedral, thus creating a lasting edifice block by block.”


If human life expectancy were 400 years…

At the end of the lecture, Professor Lindqvist viewed it as problematic that the history of the Nobel Prize evaluates the development of science within the short period of around 100 years since its creation, a relatively short history, as permanent truth; he stated that if we humans lived for 400 years, we might be “more modest with regard to their faith in current scientific knowledge as being eternally true.” Even cathedrals of science that seem complete are unstable constructions that eventually require rebuilding according to new laws or principles.

Three-way discussion

After the lecture, Professor Lindqvist was joined on the stage by Professor Takaaki Kajita and Professor Takuji Okamoto.

Professor Kajita, who won a Nobel Prize in Physics in 2015 for achieving the discovery of neutrino oscillations, which shows that neutrinos have mass, stated that “The impact of the discovery was to show that the standard model for particle physics was not perfect—that is to say, that it necessary to expand and extend the standard model in some way,” but “it is necessary to think of a better theory with reference to the current standard model.”

Furthermore, discussion continued into themes such as the reasons for the significant increase in the number of Nobel laureates in Japan in the fields of science since 2002, the fact that many Nobel laureates have been influenced by experiences and education at the age of around 12 to 13 years, and the spirit of scientists to take on challenges. Professor Kajita said that, “The environment of invention must not have a hierarchical structure. In that sense, I think that the Japanese university system still needs improvement.”

Q&A session

Many questions were raised in the question and answer session with the floor, concerning issues such as the relationship between Nobel laureates and nationality, gender balance, contributions from Asia in the process of building a cathedral of science, and the place of humanity in the “development of science.” Professor Okamoto stated that we must not forget that the efforts of all those who may not be visible, such as those not eligible for a Nobel Prize, also make possible the existence of humanity in general. On the day of the event, participants exceeding capacity came to venue, and there was an active exchange of ideas concerning the future of humanity.


Date(s) May 27th (Mon), 2019, 1:30-3:30pm (1:00 pm Doors Open)

Fukutake Learning Theater, The University of Tokyo (B2 Floor, Fukutake Hall, Hongo Campus)

Registration Pre-registration required (160 seats available -First come, first served)
Language English and Japanese(Simultaneous translation available)
Organized by Tokyo College, The University of Tokyo

Upcoming Events

“Intangibles, Inequality, and Prolonged Stagnation” Lecture by Prof. KIYOTAKI Nobuhiro


Wednesday, 24 August 2022 3:00pm-4:30pm JST

In this webinar, Prof. Kiyotaki discusses how production and income distribution interact with accumulation of intangible capital over time and across individuals. He constructs an economic model in which the younger generation acquires and accumulates intangible capital through the on-the-job training. He shows that, although the development of mid-career labor markets improves the match between firms and workers, such development may increase inequality and lead to long-term stagnation. In response, he will examine the effects of policies that promote basic education and the acquisition of skills outside of firms.

Family and Inequality: “Diverging Destinies” in Japan? Lecture by Prof. James RAYMO


Tuesday, 13 September 2022, 5:00-6:30pm

How relevant are theoretical frameworks developed in the U.S. and Europe for understanding patterns of family change and socioeconomic inequality in Japan? I begin to address this question by synthesizing the results of several recent papers on socioeconomic differences in family demographic behavior and children’s well-being in Japan.

Previous Events

Tokyo College Lecture “How the Russo-Ukrainian War is Changing European International Order: The Perspective from Japan”

イベント予定共催/Joint Event講演会/Lecture

Friday, 29 July 2022, 3:00-5:00 pm (Doors open: 2:30 pm)

The Russo-Ukrainian War is changing the structure of international order and security in Western Europe. Did it mend the EU's diplomatic and security divisions in Western Europe, or did it reaffirm them?
How is Japan's response to the war in Russia and Ukraine perceived in the West, and how will it affect Japan's future relations with Western nations?

“The Future of Europe and the EU-Japan Partnership: The War in Ukraine and its Impact on Europe and Beyond” Lecture by H.E. Herman Van Rompuy

イベント予定共催/Joint Event講演会/Lecture

Tuesday, 12 July 2022, 1:00-2:45 pm (Doors open: 12:30 pm)

The war in Ukraine has shaken our confidence in peace and prosperity within Europe and beyond. What is needed to overcome such a crisis in international relations? H.E. Herman Van Rompuy, President Emeritus of the European Council, leads the discussion by sharing his insights on the future of Europe and Japan which will be followed by Q&A sessions with students and others.

“Rereading Proust in 2022” Lecture by Prof. Antoine Compagnon


Thursday, 23 June 2022, 4:00-5:30 pm (Doors open: 3:30 pm)

In 2022, we are commemorating the centennial of Marcel Proust's death with an extraordinary salvo of publications, exhibitions, and acclamations. “Proust is the man of the year,” advertised the Italian magazine La Repubblica on New Year’s Day. It gives us an occasion to evaluate the magnitude of his novel, Remembrance of Things Past or In Search of Lost Time, and also to compare this anniversary with the previous one, 1971, a century after Proust’s birth. His star hasn’t stopped rising.

“Rethinking Methodology in Global Diplomacy” Lecture by Prof. SHIMAZU Naoko


Tuesday, 7 June 2022, 4:00-5:30 pm (Doors open: 3:30pm)

Why do we need to rethink about the way we study and make sense of global diplomacy? In this lecture, I explore how cultural approaches can illuminate important aspects of diplomacy which have not been adequately considered in much of the existing scholarly literature.

“Globalisation, Empires, and the Making of the Modern World” Lecture by Prof. A. G. Hopkins


Friday, 13 May 2022, 15:00-16:30 (Doors open: 14:40)

This talk describes three phases of globalisation that have occupied the last five centuries and their role in making the world we know today. The first two phases were associated with the rise of Western empires, which integrated large parts of the world through a process of compulsory globalisation. The third phase, which began after 1945, brought empires to an end and produced the current world order - and disorder.

“Trade war, global pandemic, Ukraine: What we know, and don’t know, about the new political and economic order” Lecture by Mr. Bill Emmott


10 May 2022, 3:00-4:30 pm (Doors open: 2:40 pm)

Recent years have featured the US-China trade war, the coronavirus pandemic, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, each of which we can consider “radically uncertain” events that were not in any real sense predictable. This lecture seeks to identify how these events fit into conventional frameworks for explaining the world, how these events might have changed that framework, what elements of the framework remain unknown, and how we should respond to this age of uncertainty.